Predictably, the slots pay a computer-prescribed return: limited by’luck’of the draw in slot winning or losing cycles. So, bet accordingly! A phrase to the wise: make the most of the perks, the advice, and get the fairly loose machines; otherwise, you are a positive loser.
We submit to numerous generic outcomes: not just testing our luck on games of chance but another big gamble: the odds no less insurmountable than Casino gambling. Oddly, no pun intended, the comparison rests inside our choice of a beneficial, spiritual, safe place, or even to the denial of supernatural existence. Areadomino Here,’chance depends on whether we’re born Judaic, Christian, Islamic, or as a doubting Thomas. Yet, like playing the slots, we are able to evaluate our luck of the draw in this regard also. We just have to discover the paying proposition.
Why compare religious ethos with a questionable ethic like gambling?
If you can accept the diversity in religious customs and their irresponsibility to established rules of engagement, you can wonder at the power or outcome in discipline assurances. A topic shrouded in mysterious symbols, numbers, parables, or other unspecific language is no easy topic to decipher, however the dilemma isn’t impossible to solve.
The slots are easy to work: first, we all know they are computers programmed to come back a certain profit to the Casino; second, we all know they must have winning and losing cycles to encourage bettors and yet assure profit for your house; third, we all know some machines are set to pay an inferior return than others; fourth, every slot winning cycle is followed by way of a losing cycle. Learn to recognize the symptoms. Some players almost always leave the Casino a winner. Allow yourself to quit a winner.
Back once again to another chance so commonly abused:
First, any spiritual belief is strictly in your head;
Second, Daniel clearly limits the monotheism experience to Ten Ages; if one doesn’t know the chronological schedule, then he is susceptible to much disillusionment and false belief;
Third, Ezekiel advises of a strict limit to benefit, to the likes of Noah, Daniel, and Job;
Fourth, involving the statements of Jesus and Paul, a strict limit to time-frame was “at hand” in the Last Age, and was arriving at an in depth in A.D. 68.
Therefore, in view of these factual observations, thinkers must commit to a reevaluation of the monotheism incentive.
If, in view of these conclusions, one still wants to gamble, take a ride on the slots, or chance a religion choice, upon what group of rules or inescapable facts will he select as an advantage in these greatly contested gambles? You can’t lose by investigating the syllogistic expressions available nowadays and caused by fifteen years of arduous research.